You will be judged. How managers fail to address workplace conflict.
Posted by: Carol
in Leadership
on Mar 10, 2010
Same song different day. “Carol, he is a good person. BUT he wants everyone to be happy and will not confront people and hold people accountable”
This statement drives me crazy!!! Why? Because it is what the folks a Crucial Conversations would call a “Sucker’s Choice.” That is a belief that people will either be happy or be held accountable.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE hear me! It is not an either or choice. In fact, it is one choice. Hold them accountable in a humane and predictable way by articulating your expectations. People will not be happy with you if they feel blindsided by allegations that they are not performing their jobs. While it is excellent that people are happy at their jobs, it is not the function of business or government to pay people to be happy. The function of work is work.
If managers, supervisors or leads are ALLOWING PEOPLE TO FAIL BECAUSE YOU ARE TOO UNCOMFORTABLE TO BE GENUINE WITH THEM THEN SHAME ON YOU!
Here is the good news. The conversation is likely not as uncomfortable as you imagine it to be. Talk about your expectations, your assumptions, and the benchmarks. Easy. The conversation is not about their personality traits or lack of skill, or other potentially demeaning stuff. It is about what the job is and requires.
Will there be push back. YEP. Especially, if you spring this on them. Instead do some prep work with the entire group so everyone is moving forward.

written by Thomas Bolt, March 13, 2010
A “Manager” who behaves in such a manner not only cheats those that do meet expectations but they rob those who may not be meeting expectations the opportunity to correct the behavior. As much as we would like to believe that what is expected is the exactly same as what is understood we have seen time and time again that is not the case. Conversations such as these do not have to be about confrontation as much as clarification. Employees in this situation will never be “happy” if they are not provided proper information. In circumstances such as this no one is “Happy”. The other employees will not be “happy”, the employee who may feel the barbs from their co-workers and not understand why will not be “happy”, the good person manager can’t be “happy” with standards not being met and staff holding an undertow of resentment and I can guarantee the person the rung above the “Manager” will not be “happy” with declining productivity and profit. The end result here can only be a loss of earning potential and decrease in the overall success of the organization. In times like these we all know that the bottom line speaks for itself.





About this post, I’m a recovering “sucker”. I used to avoid confrontation in the hopes of keeping people happy. Just like you say in your post, it doesn’t work, it’s actually counterproductive and makes people very unhappy when they are finally confronted or held accountable.
It’s best to just practice being upfront with people from the time you first deal with them.